|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 22, 2013 19:47:08 GMT -5
Because a scum would follow the crowd and most of the crowd was accusing Bane. So like you're doing? Just defending Potato and targeting Bane and me? I am neutral and My mind is open to anyone being scum though Potato has not done anything to make me believe he's scum. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 22, 2013 19:47:43 GMT -5
I am quite suspicious of Potato. At first he accused Bane, but then, when, after giving it some thought, I accused Bane, he just turned on me. Where's the sense in that? Where's the sense in you agreeing with Bane, and admitting that he made good points, And then turning on him when accused of being his ally just to not disappoint. He had some good points before, but he didn't react well to your questioning. And disappoint who? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 22, 2013 19:48:03 GMT -5
Betray you? I didn't know you had an alliance. I meant he seemed to be supporting me. So that makes him your ally or was? |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 22, 2013 19:49:25 GMT -5
I meant he seemed to be supporting me. So that makes him your ally or was? No "ally," he just seemed to think I was loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 22, 2013 19:49:45 GMT -5
I'm not pushing suspicion onto Luke like you said I just added in another suspicion, which I'm sure will help us get ahead. But the thing is, he didn't have anything suspicious about him accept a *very* mild case of inactivity, which at least 3 others had in plenty. If you're accusing them of something like that, then why not start with people like Altava? Very odd........ He's usually better than this, although he could be lurking around to not be killed for being active. Still, I was expecting him to be much more hyperactive. Anyway, I'd propose a Malgus vote. One of the main reasons being the wishy washy statements he wrote. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 22, 2013 19:50:14 GMT -5
So like you're doing? Just defending Potato and targeting Bane and me? I am neutral and My mind is open to anyone being scum though Potato has not done anything to make me believe he's scum. I see. But you don't seem very neutral now. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 22, 2013 19:51:55 GMT -5
But the thing is, he didn't have anything suspicious about him accept a *very* mild case of inactivity, which at least 3 others had in plenty. If you're accusing them of something like that, then why not start with people like Altava? Very odd........ He's usually better than this, although he could be lurking around to not be killed for being active. Still, I was expecting him to be much more hyperactive. Anyway, I'd propose a Malgus vote. One of the main reasons being the wishy washy statements he wrote. I know you have to rhyme, but wishy washy? |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 22, 2013 19:52:48 GMT -5
He's usually better than this, although he could be lurking around to not be killed for being active. Still, I was expecting him to be much more hyperactive. Anyway, I'd propose a Malgus vote. One of the main reasons being the wishy washy statements he wrote. I know you have to rhyme, but wishy washy? OOC: I though it was sort of funny.  |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 22, 2013 19:53:09 GMT -5
I am neutral and My mind is open to anyone being scum though Potato has not done anything to make me believe he's scum. I see. But you don't seem very neutral now. Because I'm suspicious of you? One must choose a side eventually and I'm not ruling out the possibility of 3PO as scum. If we never choose sides there would be no convictions and no scum dead. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 22, 2013 19:54:42 GMT -5
I see. But you don't seem very neutral now. Because I'm suspicious of you? One must choose a side eventually and I'm not ruling out the possibility of 3PO as scum. If we never choose sides there would be no convictions and no scum dead. I'm not saying that you can't choose a side, but you can't call yourself neutral after doing it. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 22, 2013 19:56:14 GMT -5
He's usually better than this, although he could be lurking around to not be killed for being active. Still, I was expecting him to be much more hyperactive. Anyway, I'd propose a Malgus vote. One of the main reasons being the wishy washy statements he wrote. I know you have to rhyme, but wishy washy? I've pulled up a dictionary result for your confusion: "lacking in decisiveness; without strength or character" Hopefully this can help you come to a conclusion. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 22, 2013 19:56:43 GMT -5
Potato's one time suspicion against me, was odd I'll grant you. But I don't think he's the most vote worthy one here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 22, 2013 19:57:05 GMT -5
I know you have to rhyme, but wishy washy? I've pulled up a dictionary result for your confusion: "lacking in decisiveness; without strength or character" Hopefully this can help you come to a conclusion. I don't think that describes me well at all. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 22, 2013 19:57:20 GMT -5
Because I'm suspicious of you? One must choose a side eventually and I'm not ruling out the possibility of 3PO as scum. If we never choose sides there would be no convictions and no scum dead. I'm not saying that you can't choose a side, but you can't call yourself neutral after doing it. I'm not fully on a side. But why should I side with you? |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 22, 2013 19:57:33 GMT -5
Potato's one time suspicion against me, was odd I'll grant you. But I don't think he's the most vote worthy one here. Who's you top suspect? |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 22, 2013 19:59:35 GMT -5
Potato's one time suspicion against me, was odd I'll grant you. But I don't think he's the most vote worthy one here. Who's you top suspect? Between you and Dimitri. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 22, 2013 19:59:52 GMT -5
I've pulled up a dictionary result for your confusion: "lacking in decisiveness; without strength or character" Hopefully this can help you come to a conclusion. I don't think that describes me well at all. It wasn't a description of you, It was of your posts, moo. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 22, 2013 20:01:12 GMT -5
I'm not saying that you can't choose a side, but you can't call yourself neutral after doing it. I'm not fully on a side. But why should I side with you? Because you should see that if Potato were loyal, he wouldn't target with me for making a decision and targeting Bane, and then accusing me of in the past siding with Bane when there is no comment to support this. I even asked. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 22, 2013 20:02:39 GMT -5
I don't think that describes me well at all. It wasn't a description of you, It was of your posts, moo. Yes, but my posts describe what I think, in essence, me! |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 22, 2013 20:03:42 GMT -5
I'm not fully on a side. But why should I side with you? Because you should see that if Potato were loyal, he wouldn't target with me for making a decision and targeting Bane, and then accusing me of in the past siding with Bane when there is no comment to support this. I even asked. Why wouldn't he target you? You been everywhere and you suddenly just target Bane even though you where not against him until he mentioned you guys as being ally's. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 22, 2013 20:04:20 GMT -5
You know, I've been thinking: It's possible that Potato's a 3rd party, since he accused Luke when there were others more guilty of that particular thing. (inactivity) I think it's very possible that Luke's one of the people he needs to kill.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 22, 2013 20:05:55 GMT -5
You know, I've been thinking: It's possible that Potato's a 3rd party, since he accused Luke when there were others more guilty of that particular thing. (inactivity) I think it's very possible that Luke's one of the people he needs to kill. Possibly but he isn't vote worthy at least not on day 1. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 22, 2013 20:07:40 GMT -5
Because you should see that if Potato were loyal, he wouldn't target with me for making a decision and targeting Bane, and then accusing me of in the past siding with Bane when there is no comment to support this. I even asked. Why wouldn't he target you? You been everywhere and you suddenly just target Bane even though you where not against him until he mentioned you guys as being ally's. So I should have eased out my targeting of Bane even though I had already made a decision to make you feel better? And now both you and 3PO are ignoring the main part of my argument. I asked for proof of me siding with Bane, but you seem to think it above yourselves to look back a the comments and find this evidence you speak about. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 22, 2013 20:08:02 GMT -5
You know, I've been thinking: It's possible that Potato's a 3rd party, since he accused Luke when there were others more guilty of that particular thing. (inactivity) I think it's very possible that Luke's one of the people he needs to kill. With that logic, it's possible you're third party, Because you've been pursuing me like a smarty. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 22, 2013 20:08:42 GMT -5
Why wouldn't he target you? You been everywhere and you suddenly just target Bane even though you where not against him until he mentioned you guys as being ally's. So I should have eased out my targeting of Bane even though I had already made a decision to make you feel better? And now both you and 3PO are ignoring the main part of my argument. I asked for proof of me siding with Bane, but you seem to think it above yourselves to look back a the comments and find this evidence you speak about. Bane seemed to consider you guys as "Friends" |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 22, 2013 20:10:27 GMT -5
Why is Bane so focused on a third party group?
This isn't the first time it's been brought up by him, and it's definitely out of the loop.
Maybe he's scum, and is worried about the third side,
Which both the Scum and Loyalists can't let slide.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 22, 2013 20:11:16 GMT -5
You know, I've been thinking: It's possible that Potato's a 3rd party, since he accused Luke when there were others more guilty of that particular thing. (inactivity) I think it's very possible that Luke's one of the people he needs to kill. With that logic, it's possible you're third party, Because you've been pursuing me like a smarty. I'm not simply accusing you, I'm also suspicious of several others. You on the other hand, seemed to be going for Luke, and then suddenly start accusing me when I got in your way. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 22, 2013 20:11:48 GMT -5
You know, I've been thinking: It's possible that Potato's a 3rd party, since he accused Luke when there were others more guilty of that particular thing. (inactivity) I think it's very possible that Luke's one of the people he needs to kill. Well I don't know about that. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 22, 2013 20:12:01 GMT -5
With that logic, it's possible you're third party, Because you've been pursuing me like a smarty. I'm not simply accusing you, I'm also suspicious of several others. You on the other hand, seemed to be going for Luke, and then suddenly start accusing me when I got in your way. Others? Who? Please tell me, moo. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 22, 2013 20:13:01 GMT -5
With that logic, it's possible you're third party, Because you've been pursuing me like a smarty. I'm not simply accusing you, I'm also suspicious of several others. You on the other hand, seemed to be going for Luke, and then suddenly start accusing me when I got in your way. I see it as he's keeping a open mind To find the scum that lie behind Sorry had to try it. It's actually fun. |
|
Wars Story
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5