|
Post by Newan on Jun 11, 2013 19:38:13 GMT -5
Who said you where not eligible to vote a confirmed loyal? Potato counted your vote in the vote tally so really your vote was for Boba. Okay so it is. I still don't get your question. WHO said you where not allowed to vote Boba?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2013 19:38:19 GMT -5
First of all I see your little comparison. You have no clue if Nam is even scum nor do I. So you can't make it seem like he's my scum ally who's coming to my rescue or whatever. I voted twice because the one I voted for wasn't eligible as said already. That's sort of the point. We have to make educated guesses and stick with them. Do juries make guesses on a man on trial. I'm the one on trial I want a fair jury. Guesses are not good enough especially if there not true. I want evidence to the contrary.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 11, 2013 19:39:52 GMT -5
And anyway Squiggy, here's my take on Newans loyalty: I *highly* doubt that a scum would put their life on the line like that. He's the backbone of this faction. So even if he got Nam voted off, (if Nam was loyal, which he isn't) he would have screwed himself for leading the vote on Nam. As I said before, a scum would normally just go with what everyone else says and let the loyals destroy themselves. He's not doing that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2013 19:39:53 GMT -5
Okay so it is. I still don't get your question. WHO said you where not allowed to vote Boba? I never said I wasn't allowed to. But if he was proven Loyal then nobody would vote for him. I slipped up not knowing he was proven loyal so I changed my vote.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 11, 2013 19:41:50 GMT -5
WHO said you where not allowed to vote Boba? I never said I wasn't allowed to. But if he was proven Loyal then nobody would vote for him. I slipped up not knowing he was proven loyal so I changed my vote. That's your fault you didnt read the page before your Boba vote. A vote is a vote you don't get a second one and yet you vote for me after "people started voting for Newan"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2013 19:42:09 GMT -5
And anyway Squiggy, here's my take on Newans loyalty: I *highly* doubt that a scum would put their life on the line like that. He's the backbone of this faction. So even if he got Nam voted off, (if Nam was loyal, which he isn't) he would have screwed himself for leading the vote on Nam. As I said before, a scum would normally just go with what everyone else says and let the loyals destroy themselves. He's not doing that. Okay I can see where your coming from on that matter.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2013 19:43:01 GMT -5
I never said I wasn't allowed to. But if he was proven Loyal then nobody would vote for him. I slipped up not knowing he was proven loyal so I changed my vote. That's your fault you didnt read the page before your Boba vote. A vote is a vote you don't get a second one and yet you vote for me after "people started voting for Newan" Yeah.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 11, 2013 19:44:55 GMT -5
I see Squiggy has no defence nor will he try does not put him in a very good spot for the future....
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 11, 2013 19:44:55 GMT -5
That's sort of the point. We have to make educated guesses and stick with them. Do juries make guesses on a man on trial. I'm the one on trial I want a fair jury. Guesses are not good enough especially if there not true. I want evidence to the contrary. Sometimes Squiggy, juries do have to make guesses in court. Only educated guesses, IF there are no witnesses, etc. It's all about the defence of the person in question.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2013 19:47:12 GMT -5
I see Squiggy has no defence nor will he try does not put him in a very good spot for the future.... Defence for what? I said yeah because you were right for the most part.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 11, 2013 19:47:53 GMT -5
And anyway Squiggy, here's my take on Newans loyalty: I *highly* doubt that a scum would put their life on the line like that. He's the backbone of this faction. So even if he got Nam voted off, (if Nam was loyal, which he isn't) he would have screwed himself for leading the vote on Nam. As I said before, a scum would normally just go with what everyone else says and let the loyals destroy themselves. He's not doing that. Just like me.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 11, 2013 19:49:54 GMT -5
I see Squiggy has no defence nor will he try does not put him in a very good spot for the future.... Defence for what? I said yeah because you were right for the most part. A real reason why you sided with Nam? What evidence is better than mine? Why you thought you would get a second vote after you voted?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2013 19:50:57 GMT -5
Defence for what? I said yeah because you were right for the most part. A real reason why you sided with Nam? What evidence is better than mine? Why you thought you would get a second vote after you voted? When did I ever side with Nam. I want quotes now.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 11, 2013 19:51:30 GMT -5
And anyway Squiggy, here's my take on Newans loyalty: I *highly* doubt that a scum would put their life on the line like that. He's the backbone of this faction. So even if he got Nam voted off, (if Nam was loyal, which he isn't) he would have screwed himself for leading the vote on Nam. As I said before, a scum would normally just go with what everyone else says and let the loyals destroy themselves. He's not doing that. Just like me. Yes Spider. I'm sorry that they voted you off.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 11, 2013 19:54:55 GMT -5
A real reason why you sided with Nam? What evidence is better than mine? Why you thought you would get a second vote after you voted? When did I ever side with Nam. I want quotes now. Alright why are you stalling? Waiting for Nam to arrive or something. You said Nam had good evidence and you directed me to the first page to see This great evidence and since people started to vote for me you decided to vote as well. A clear lie I see another reason your Nams ally.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 11, 2013 19:56:10 GMT -5
And anyway Squiggy, here's my take on Newans loyalty: I *highly* doubt that a scum would put their life on the line like that. He's the backbone of this faction. So even if he got Nam voted off, (if Nam was loyal, which he isn't) he would have screwed himself for leading the vote on Nam. As I said before, a scum would normally just go with what everyone else says and let the loyals destroy themselves. He's not doing that. Just like me. Yes Spider. Just like you. Sorry I was stupid to vote you off.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2013 19:57:02 GMT -5
When did I ever side with Nam. I want quotes now. Alright why are you stalling? Waiting for Nam to arrive or something. You said Nam had good evidence and you directed me to the first page to see This great evidence and since people started to vote for me you decided to vote as well. A clear lie I see another reason your Nams ally. Why are you stalling? I said quotes this is not what I asked for to prove I sided with Nam...at all. That is a different matter that I already told you about and answered.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 11, 2013 19:57:23 GMT -5
When did I ever side with Nam. I want quotes now. Alright why are you stalling? Waiting for Nam to arrive or something. You said Nam had good evidence and you directed me to the first page to see This great evidence and since people started to vote for me you decided to vote as well. A clear lie I see another reason your Nams ally. No offence, but Nam would be a fool to defend Squiggy now.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 11, 2013 19:58:13 GMT -5
Is it still 2 to 6 with Nam having the most votes?
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 11, 2013 19:58:58 GMT -5
Alright why are you stalling? Waiting for Nam to arrive or something. You said Nam had good evidence and you directed me to the first page to see This great evidence and since people started to vote for me you decided to vote as well. A clear lie I see another reason your Nams ally. Why are you stalling? I said quotes this is not what I asked for to prove I sided with Nam...at all. That is a different matter that I already told you about and answered. Just answer my question. Oh and let me direct you to the last page your vote for me was clear indication you sided with Nam.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 11, 2013 19:59:26 GMT -5
Is it still 2 to 6 with Nam having the most votes? I think it's Nam-8 Newan-2 Boba-1
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 11, 2013 20:00:50 GMT -5
Why are you stalling? I said quotes this is not what I asked for to prove I sided with Nam...at all. That is a different matter that I already told you about and answered. Just answer my question. Oh and let me direct you to the last page your vote for me was clear indication you sided with Nam. Yes, you just voted with Nam; you didn't even provide any evidence. You just said: "look back on previous pages" or something like that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2013 20:01:19 GMT -5
Why are you stalling? I said quotes this is not what I asked for to prove I sided with Nam...at all. That is a different matter that I already told you about and answered. Just answer my question. Oh and let me direct you to the last page your vote for me was clear indication you sided with Nam. What damn question? I didn't side with Nam. Just because he happened to vote for him doesn't mean that I sided with him at all. This is so retarded.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 11, 2013 20:01:23 GMT -5
Is it still 2 to 6 with Nam having the most votes? I think it's Nam-8 Newan-2 Boba-1 Good.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 11, 2013 20:01:28 GMT -5
Is it still 2 to 6 with Nam having the most votes? I think it's Nam-8 Newan-2 Boba-1 Uh.... Counting both of Squiggy's votes?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2013 20:02:43 GMT -5
Just answer my question. Oh and let me direct you to the last page your vote for me was clear indication you sided with Nam. Yes, you just voted with Nam; you didn't even provide any evidence. You just said: "look back on previous pages" or something like that. Well I only know If I really did or did not.
|
|
Fisto
Jedi
Clone Wars is back!
Posts: 755
|
Post by Fisto on Jun 11, 2013 20:03:08 GMT -5
Is it still 2 to 6 with Nam having the most votes? I think it's Nam-8 Newan-2 Boba-1 I think it's Nam-7 Newan-2 Boba-1
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 11, 2013 20:04:08 GMT -5
Just answer my question. Oh and let me direct you to the last page your vote for me was clear indication you sided with Nam. What damn question? I didn't side with Nam. Just because he happened to vote for him doesn't mean that I sided with him at all. This is so retarded. Well Squiggy, you said that Namialus had better points then Newan, that Newan's point's didn't make sense, etc. just like Namialus did. And you voted for Newan. That's pretty much copying what Namialus said.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 11, 2013 20:04:33 GMT -5
Just answer my question. Oh and let me direct you to the last page your vote for me was clear indication you sided with Nam. What damn question? I didn't side with Nam. Just because he happened to vote for him doesn't mean that I sided with him at all. This is so retarded. Defence for what? I said yeah because you were right for the most part. A real reason why you sided with Nam? What evidence is better than mine? Why you thought you would get a second vote after you voted? Those question right there. And you voted me cause others where voting me so if your done trolling or something the questions are in front of you
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 11, 2013 20:05:29 GMT -5
I think it's Nam-8 Newan-2 Boba-1 I think it's Nam-7 Newan-2 Boba-1 I think Me Malgus Bane Mav Fisto Killa Ivar Boba all voted for Nam
|
|