|
Post by Pinda on Jun 7, 2013 9:56:58 GMT -5
So you just randomly vote someone off? OOC: Ah, Pinda, we meet again. IC: Not exactly. OOC: What's that supposed to mean? IC: Then why did you say it was a stab in the dark and not give any reasons for voting for me.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 7, 2013 10:11:00 GMT -5
Wait, do we need majority?
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 7, 2013 10:11:02 GMT -5
OOC: Ah, Pinda, we meet again. IC: Not exactly. OOC: What's that supposed to mean? IC: Then why did you say it was a stab in the dark and not give any reasons for voting for me. OOC: It just means "We meet again" IC: It was a stab in the dark but my vote was influenced by other things.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 7, 2013 10:12:33 GMT -5
Wait, do we need majority? Yes.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 7, 2013 10:14:13 GMT -5
Wait, do we need majority? Yes. Damn it. Everyone vote Kenobi. We need a conclusion.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 7, 2013 10:17:49 GMT -5
Damn it. Everyone vote Kenobi. We need a conclusion. Kenobi? Not scummy at all to me.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 7, 2013 10:19:06 GMT -5
Damn it. Everyone vote Kenobi. We need a conclusion. Kenobi? Not scummy at all to me. Why do you find Pinda more scummy?
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 7, 2013 10:21:07 GMT -5
VOTE: KENOBI He seemed far to friendly with Pinda, and seemed to support him on everything. This suggests that either they're both scum, or that Kenobi simply wants to appear loyal. I am inclined to believe the latter possibility.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jun 7, 2013 10:29:25 GMT -5
VOTE TALLY:
Newan-2 Pinda-1 Kenobi-5 8+ equals majority of the votes, so you need at least 3 more votes for Kenobi.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 7, 2013 10:31:40 GMT -5
Kenobi? Not scummy at all to me. Why do you find Pinda more scummy? Pinda is just scummy. We haven't really got any evidence against Kenobi. And people who vote Kenobi say it is partly because he followed/sided with Pinda. When I said Scruffy and Nat were suspicious for following each other, everyone else said it was not proof at all.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 7, 2013 10:33:25 GMT -5
VOTE TALLY: Newan-2 Pinda-1 Kenobi-5 8+ equals majority of the votes, so you need at least 3 more votes for Kenobi. Hopefully people will come to their senses and vote Pinda or someone else equally scummy.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 7, 2013 10:36:40 GMT -5
I find Kenobi more suspicious because he clinger onto to Pinda. Pinda at least was forming as own opinions and making theories. Kenobi was just agreeing with everything Pinda said.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 7, 2013 10:39:39 GMT -5
I find Kenobi more suspicious because he clinger onto to Pinda. Pinda at least was forming as own opinions and making theories. Kenobi was just agreeing with everything Pinda said. It sounds like Kenobi is more likely scum, but could it be possible that they both are?
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 7, 2013 10:41:11 GMT -5
I find Kenobi more suspicious because he clinger onto to Pinda. Pinda at least was forming as own opinions and making theories. Kenobi was just agreeing with everything Pinda said. It's a possibility that they could be the confirmed loyals. (I don't know what they're call) We'll have to wait and see.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jun 7, 2013 10:42:06 GMT -5
*cough*don't forget about Loyal Knights*cough*
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 7, 2013 10:43:47 GMT -5
*cough*don't forget about Loyal Knights*cough* Do you think both Pinda and Kenobi are Loyal Knights?
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 7, 2013 10:45:49 GMT -5
*cough*don't forget about Loyal Knights*cough* That's what they're called!
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jun 7, 2013 10:46:52 GMT -5
*cough*don't forget about Loyal Knights*cough* Do you think both Pinda and Kenobi are Loyal Knights? Can't say. I'm not playing.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 7, 2013 10:48:22 GMT -5
Do you think both Pinda and Kenobi are Loyal Knights? Can't say. I'm not playing. Oh. Oh yeah!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2013 10:49:07 GMT -5
Why do you find Pinda more scummy? Pinda is just scummy. We haven't really got any evidence against Kenobi. And people who vote Kenobi say it is partly because he followed/sided with Pinda. When I said Scruffy and Nat were suspicious for following each other, everyone else said it was not proof at all. Scruffy and I were not following each other, and if you really do think that, then your definition of "following" must be quite odd.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 7, 2013 10:50:25 GMT -5
As said in the pictures, you do not need a majority vote. It's the player with the most votes.
VOTE TALLY:
Newan- 2
Kenobi- 5
Pinda- 1
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 7, 2013 10:50:35 GMT -5
Pinda is just scummy. We haven't really got any evidence against Kenobi. And people who vote Kenobi say it is partly because he followed/sided with Pinda. When I said Scruffy and Nat were suspicious for following each other, everyone else said it was not proof at all. Scruffy and I were not following each other, and if you really do think that, then your definition of "following" must be quite odd. I don't think anybody is "following" Scruffy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2013 10:51:42 GMT -5
As said in the pictures, you do not need a majority vote. It's the player with the most votes. VOTE TALLY: Newan- 1 Kenobi- 5 Pinda- 1 Newan's got two, Malgus and Scruffy.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 7, 2013 10:52:00 GMT -5
Scruffy and I were not following each other, and if you really do think that, then your definition of "following" must be quite odd. I don't think anybody is "following" Scruffy. Were following. Not now
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 7, 2013 10:52:55 GMT -5
I don't think anybody is "following" Scruffy. Were following. Not now Ah.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 7, 2013 10:54:08 GMT -5
As said in the pictures, you do not need a majority vote. It's the player with the most votes. VOTE TALLY: Newan- 1 Kenobi- 5 Pinda- 1 Newan's got two, Malgus and Scruffy. That's... um, what I said.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 7, 2013 10:55:10 GMT -5
Why do you find Pinda more scummy? Pinda is just scummy. We haven't really got any evidence against Kenobi. And people who vote Kenobi say it is partly because he followed/sided with Pinda. When I said Scruffy and Nat were suspicious for following each other, everyone else said it was not proof at all. "Pinda is just scummy" Well that is a very good argument... And if Kenobi sided with me that would make him more suspicious than me because I couldn't help it. What if he sided with you? Assuming you're loyal (which I really start to doubt) you'd be blamed for it and maybe get voted off and then Kenobi would look very loyal if you turn up loyal the next day.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 7, 2013 10:55:36 GMT -5
Newan's got two, Malgus and Scruffy. That's... um, what I said. You said Newan had 1.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2013 10:55:36 GMT -5
I don't think anybody is "following" Scruffy. Were following. Not now No, pretty sure we were never following each other. I summed up what he said, and he agreed with other thigs I said only once. That is not following. If you think that it is, you might want to look it up in a good ol' dictionary.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jun 7, 2013 10:55:44 GMT -5
Can't say. I'm not playing. Oh. Oh yeah! *looks around and then whispers* But if you really want to know what I think, I'd say...*Potato slaps me before I can say and says I'll have to leave the party if I say* Whoops, sorry, looks like I can't tell you.
|
|