|
|
Post by bane on May 7, 2013 19:09:14 GMT -5
Ha, I'll come up loyal, especially because there is no janitor. I know you will......  |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 7, 2013 19:17:57 GMT -5
Ha, I'll come up loyal, especially because there is no janitor. We're sure you will. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:19:02 GMT -5
And since I may not be voted off, I'd like to convince everyone who hasn't voted yet to not vote for me:
-At first, I suspected Sergemont for his wild behaviour. Viggor and Meldor followed.
-I then looked over the comments and realized that Meldor's ideas about Sergemont's scum tactics were beyond wild.
-I began questioning Meldor to which Viggor quickly defended him.
-Then Meldor began *accusing* me, believing I was scum merely because I questioned and accused him. He believed I want him dead because I am scum (which I am not, you will see tomorrow).
-Meldor also used OOC evidence (something most scum would do.)
-Meldor also PMed Durri on Day 1. Interesting.
BUT, although my evidence posted above seems to be against Meldor, I believe that out of these three, Durri, Meldor, and Viggor, at least one is scum. It can't be both Durri and Meldor because they PMed each other, something pointless for scum to do. It *could* be Meldor and Viggor, which my evidence points to, but Meldor was sketchy of Viggor in his PMs with Durri. Now, I think the most plausible theories of who is scum out of these 3 are Durri and Viggor BOTH being on the scum, or just Meldor alone.
I want you to read this all because I am loyal and I highly advise you not to vote for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:19:55 GMT -5
Ha, I'll come up loyal, especially because there is no janitor. We're sure you will.  |
|
|
|
Post by bane on May 7, 2013 19:22:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 7, 2013 19:24:51 GMT -5
And since I may not be voted off, I'd like to convince everyone who hasn't voted yet to not vote for me: -At first, I suspected Sergemont for his wild behaviour. Viggor and Meldor followed. -I then looked over the comments and realized that Meldor's ideas about Sergemont's scum tactics were beyond wild. -I began questioning Meldor to which Viggor quickly defended him. -Then Meldor began *accusing* me, believing I was scum merely because I questioned and accused him. He believed I want him dead because I am scum (which I am not, you will see tomorrow). -Meldor also used OOC evidence (something most scum would do.) -Meldor also PMed Durri on Day 1. Interesting. BUT, although my evidence posted above seems to be against Meldor, I believe that out of these three, Durri, Meldor, and Viggor, at least one is scum. It can't be both Durri and Meldor because they PMed each other, something pointless for scum to do. It *could* be Meldor and Viggor, which my evidence points to, but Meldor was sketchy of Viggor in his PMs with Durri. Now, I think the most plausible theories of who is scum out of these 3 are Durri and Viggor BOTH being on the scum, or just Meldor alone. I want you to read this all because I am loyal and I highly advise you not to vote for me.There is no such thing as beyond scum. Someone who wants us to think that there is would tell us otherwise. You had stupid evidence. Why wouldn't anyone else notice that if they were loyal? And I messaged Durri because I was pretty sure I was going to be voted off and I needed to convince people that you were fooling them. So after I died, you'd follow. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:24:59 GMT -5
I advise you all to read my comment above before you vote. It's only logical.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 7, 2013 19:26:11 GMT -5
READ ALL OF THIS SO YOU KNOW WHY TO VOTE FOR LUCTO:
I came on here and saw that Lucto accused Surgemont. I read back through past conversations and saw that Bane was indeed acting odd. We continued to question Surgemont, and he seemed more and more suspicious. I was pretty sure my vote would be for him. And all of a sudden, Lucto turned on me. He stared accusing me and dropped all suspicions of Surgemont. He accused me for accusing Surgemont and he's the one accused Surgemont in the first place. Viggor pointed out his suspicions made no sense, so now he think's we're scum together.
In case you haven't figured it out, I suspect Lucto. Here's why:
He's a total hypocrite. He's accusing me for suspecting me for suspecting Surgemont and he's the only one who made us all suspicious of him in the first place. There was good evidence he was scum, but it's like he was brainwashed and was intent on killing me. And now him and Surgemont are total buddies. He just really wants me gone and he knows he can do it without evidence because he's influentialI promise to you that I am loyal, but I cannot prove that without cheating. I know he's trying to pull the same thing he did last game. He's just pointing a finger at me for no reason. I know he's scum and he just wants me gone now because I can see through all of his acts.
As always, it's your choice to believe me or not. But if you don't, you'll fail and die just like last game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:26:38 GMT -5
And since I may not be voted off, I'd like to convince everyone who hasn't voted yet to not vote for me: -At first, I suspected Sergemont for his wild behaviour. Viggor and Meldor followed. -I then looked over the comments and realized that Meldor's ideas about Sergemont's scum tactics were beyond wild. -I began questioning Meldor to which Viggor quickly defended him. -Then Meldor began *accusing* me, believing I was scum merely because I questioned and accused him. He believed I want him dead because I am scum (which I am not, you will see tomorrow). -Meldor also used OOC evidence (something most scum would do.) -Meldor also PMed Durri on Day 1. Interesting. BUT, although my evidence posted above seems to be against Meldor, I believe that out of these three, Durri, Meldor, and Viggor, at least one is scum. It can't be both Durri and Meldor because they PMed each other, something pointless for scum to do. It *could* be Meldor and Viggor, which my evidence points to, but Meldor was sketchy of Viggor in his PMs with Durri. Now, I think the most plausible theories of who is scum out of these 3 are Durri and Viggor BOTH being on the scum, or just Meldor alone. I want you to read this all because I am loyal and I highly advise you not to vote for me.There is no such thing as beyond scum. Someone who wants us to think that there is would tell us otherwise. You had stupid evidence. Why wouldn't anyone else notice that if they were loyal? And I messaged Durri because I was pretty sure I was going to be voted off and I needed to convince people that you were fooling them. So after I died, you'd follow. "There is no such thing as beyond scum." What? Stupid evidence? You think it was stupid because it was against you. And your evidence against me was stupid because it was OOC. I am not fooling anyone. I don't want to be voted off, but I can't wait for you to see my loyalty. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 7, 2013 19:28:24 GMT -5
There is no such thing as beyond scum. Someone who wants us to think that there is would tell us otherwise. You had stupid evidence. Why wouldn't anyone else notice that if they were loyal? And I messaged Durri because I was pretty sure I was going to be voted off and I needed to convince people that you were fooling them. So after I died, you'd follow. "There is no such thing as beyond scum." What? Stupid evidence? You think it was stupid because it was against you. And your evidence against me was stupid because it was OOC. I am not fooling anyone. I don't want to be voted off, but I can't wait for you to see my loyalty. You said they way Surgemont was acting was beyond how the scum would act. And no, it wasn't OOC. I'll see your loyalty, or "scumty" I should say, soon enough. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on May 7, 2013 19:28:36 GMT -5
I just ate a Potato.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 7, 2013 19:29:05 GMT -5
There is no such thing as beyond scum. Someone who wants us to think that there is would tell us otherwise. You had stupid evidence. Why wouldn't anyone else notice that if they were loyal? And I messaged Durri because I was pretty sure I was going to be voted off and I needed to convince people that you were fooling them. So after I died, you'd follow. "There is no such thing as beyond scum." What? Stupid evidence? You think it was stupid because it was against you. And your evidence against me was stupid because it was OOC. I am not fooling anyone. I don't want to be voted off, but I can't wait for you to see my loyalty. And it was stupid because it wasn't even evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:29:14 GMT -5
READ ALL OF THIS SO YOU KNOW WHY TO VOTE FOR LUCTO:I came on here and saw that Lucto accused Surgemont. I read back through past conversations and saw that Bane was indeed acting odd. We continued to question Surgemont, and he seemed more and more suspicious. I was pretty sure my vote would be for him. And all of a sudden, Lucto turned on me. He stared accusing me and dropped all suspicions of Surgemont. He accused me for accusing Surgemont and he's the one accused Surgemont in the first place. Viggor pointed out his suspicions made no sense, so now he think's we're scum together. In case you haven't figured it out, I suspect Lucto. Here's why: He's a total hypocrite. He's accusing me for suspecting me for suspecting Surgemont and he's the only one who made us all suspicious of him in the first place. There was good evidence he was scum, but it's like he was brainwashed and was intent on killing me. And now him and Surgemont are total buddies. He just really wants me gone and he knows he can do it without evidence because he's influentialI promise to you that I am loyal, but I cannot prove that without cheating. I know he's trying to pull the same thing he did last game. He's just pointing a finger at me for no reason. I know he's scum and he just wants me gone now because I can see through all of his acts. As always, it's your choice to believe me or not. But if you don't, you'll fail and die just like last game. Can you stop using OOC evidence? Only scum do. And I can't defend myself against OOC evidence. Anyways. I am not intent on killing you (unless you're scum, which you probably are.) Sergemont and I are NOT total buddies, I will vote him off if any real evidence (other than his RP) is brought against him. I don't really want you gone (unless you're scum, which you probably are) and if I did, I would have accused you right from the beginning, before Sergemont. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:29:34 GMT -5
"There is no such thing as beyond scum." What? Stupid evidence? You think it was stupid because it was against you. And your evidence against me was stupid because it was OOC. I am not fooling anyone. I don't want to be voted off, but I can't wait for you to see my loyalty. And it was stupid because it wasn't even evidence. Really? How? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:30:26 GMT -5
"There is no such thing as beyond scum." What? Stupid evidence? You think it was stupid because it was against you. And your evidence against me was stupid because it was OOC. I am not fooling anyone. I don't want to be voted off, but I can't wait for you to see my loyalty. You said they way Surgemont was acting was beyond how the scum would act. And no, it wasn't OOC. I'll see your loyalty, or "scumty" I should say, soon enough. It was OOC. Are you seriously saying it wasn't? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:31:18 GMT -5
And also: I do have a loyal role. Can't say but I do.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on May 7, 2013 19:32:15 GMT -5
OOC: yes I agree with Nam now we should try to advoid alot over use of OOC since it is kinda unfair.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 7, 2013 19:32:57 GMT -5
READ ALL OF THIS SO YOU KNOW WHY TO VOTE FOR LUCTO:I came on here and saw that Lucto accused Surgemont. I read back through past conversations and saw that Bane was indeed acting odd. We continued to question Surgemont, and he seemed more and more suspicious. I was pretty sure my vote would be for him. And all of a sudden, Lucto turned on me. He stared accusing me and dropped all suspicions of Surgemont. He accused me for accusing Surgemont and he's the one accused Surgemont in the first place. Viggor pointed out his suspicions made no sense, so now he think's we're scum together. In case you haven't figured it out, I suspect Lucto. Here's why: He's a total hypocrite. He's accusing me for suspecting me for suspecting Surgemont and he's the only one who made us all suspicious of him in the first place. There was good evidence he was scum, but it's like he was brainwashed and was intent on killing me. And now him and Surgemont are total buddies. He just really wants me gone and he knows he can do it without evidence because he's influentialI promise to you that I am loyal, but I cannot prove that without cheating. I know he's trying to pull the same thing he did last game. He's just pointing a finger at me for no reason. I know he's scum and he just wants me gone now because I can see through all of his acts. As always, it's your choice to believe me or not. But if you don't, you'll fail and die just like last game. Can you stop using OOC evidence? Only scum do. And I can't defend myself against OOC evidence. Anyways. I am not intent on killing you (unless you're scum, which you probably are.) Sergemont and I are NOT total buddies, I will vote him off if any real evidence (other than his RP) is brought against him. I don't really want you gone (unless you're scum, which you probably are) and if I did, I would have accused you right from the beginning, before Sergemont. Yes, you are. Why else would you vote for me with no evidence? And you suddenly forgot Surgemont was suspicious and started accusing me. If it's because he's scum or if you just are more scared I'll discover your scum plots I'm not sure. And you wouldn't suddenly accuse me, it would be way more obvious you were scum than if you suspected someone else first. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2013 19:32:58 GMT -5
At least there is no janitor. I will come up loyal, Meldor, Viggor, or Durri will be voted off, and 1-3 are scum. Also.... watch out for others like Loc-Ri, Darren, Cal, and even Sergemont. Care to explain the reasons why you suspect me? OOC: Sorry I haven't posted earlier, but there was 5 pages for me to read.  |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:33:02 GMT -5
OOC: yes I agree with Nam now we should try to advoid alot over use of OOC since it is kinda unfair. OOC: Thank you, although that is unavoidable considering I'm already being voted off. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 7, 2013 19:33:59 GMT -5
READ ALL OF THIS SO YOU KNOW WHY TO VOTE FOR LUCTO:I came on here and saw that Lucto accused Surgemont. I read back through past conversations and saw that Bane was indeed acting odd. We continued to question Surgemont, and he seemed more and more suspicious. I was pretty sure my vote would be for him. And all of a sudden, Lucto turned on me. He stared accusing me and dropped all suspicions of Surgemont. He accused me for accusing Surgemont and he's the one accused Surgemont in the first place. Viggor pointed out his suspicions made no sense, so now he think's we're scum together. In case you haven't figured it out, I suspect Lucto. Here's why: He's a total hypocrite. He's accusing me for suspecting me for suspecting Surgemont and he's the only one who made us all suspicious of him in the first place. There was good evidence he was scum, but it's like he was brainwashed and was intent on killing me. And now him and Surgemont are total buddies. He just really wants me gone and he knows he can do it without evidence because he's influentialI promise to you that I am loyal, but I cannot prove that without cheating. I know he's trying to pull the same thing he did last game. He's just pointing a finger at me for no reason. I know he's scum and he just wants me gone now because I can see through all of his acts. As always, it's your choice to believe me or not. But if you don't, you'll fail and die just like last game. Can you stop using OOC evidence? Only scum do. And I can't defend myself against OOC evidence. Anyways. I am not intent on killing you (unless you're scum, which you probably are.) Sergemont and I are NOT total buddies, I will vote him off if any real evidence (other than his RP) is brought against him. I don't really want you gone (unless you're scum, which you probably are) and if I did, I would have accused you right from the beginning, before Sergemont. And which part of my evidence is OOC? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:34:03 GMT -5
Can you stop using OOC evidence? Only scum do. And I can't defend myself against OOC evidence. Anyways. I am not intent on killing you (unless you're scum, which you probably are.) Sergemont and I are NOT total buddies, I will vote him off if any real evidence (other than his RP) is brought against him. I don't really want you gone (unless you're scum, which you probably are) and if I did, I would have accused you right from the beginning, before Sergemont. Yes, you are. Why else would you vote for me with no evidence? And you suddenly forgot Surgemont was suspicious and started accusing me. If it's because he's scum or if you just are more scared I'll discover your scum plots I'm not sure. And you wouldn't suddenly accuse me, it would be way more obvious you were scum than if you suspected someone else first. Could you please disprove my evidence? I did not "forget", I merely found new evidence. Is it a problem that I accused you? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:34:22 GMT -5
Can you stop using OOC evidence? Only scum do. And I can't defend myself against OOC evidence. Anyways. I am not intent on killing you (unless you're scum, which you probably are.) Sergemont and I are NOT total buddies, I will vote him off if any real evidence (other than his RP) is brought against him. I don't really want you gone (unless you're scum, which you probably are) and if I did, I would have accused you right from the beginning, before Sergemont. And which part of my evidence is OOC? All the parts that mentioned last game. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2013 19:34:37 GMT -5
OOC: yes I agree with Nam now we should try to advoid alot over use of OOC since it is kinda unfair. OOC: I agree that it's unfair, which is why I am not using it. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:34:54 GMT -5
At least there is no janitor. I will come up loyal, Meldor, Viggor, or Durri will be voted off, and 1-3 are scum. Also.... watch out for others like Loc-Ri, Darren, Cal, and even Sergemont. Care to explain the reasons why you suspect me? OOC: Sorry I haven't posted earlier, but there was 5 pages for me to read. You agreed with Meldor and everyone else who voted for me, and I *know* I'm loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 7, 2013 19:35:07 GMT -5
Yes, you are. Why else would you vote for me with no evidence? And you suddenly forgot Surgemont was suspicious and started accusing me. If it's because he's scum or if you just are more scared I'll discover your scum plots I'm not sure. And you wouldn't suddenly accuse me, it would be way more obvious you were scum than if you suspected someone else first. Could you please disprove my evidence? I did not "forget", I merely found new evidence. Is it a problem that I accused you? Yes it is. Because it was sudden and made no sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on May 7, 2013 19:35:16 GMT -5
OOC: yes I agree with Nam now we should try to advoid alot over use of OOC since it is kinda unfair. OOC: Thank you, although that is unavoidable considering I'm already being voted off. Well technically I still think your scum OOC: but yet it is hard to defend against though I do it sometimes more as a force of habit as it comes to my mind |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:35:27 GMT -5
More proof that my evidence is better than Meldor's: His is mostly OOC whereas mine is completely IC.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 7, 2013 19:36:00 GMT -5
Could you please disprove my evidence? I did not "forget", I merely found new evidence. Is it a problem that I accused you? Yes it is. Because it was sudden and made no sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 7, 2013 19:36:02 GMT -5
And which part of my evidence is OOC? All the parts that mentioned last game. Ok, the last sentence was OOC. But it wasn't evidence. |
|
Wars Story
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5