|
|
Post by Newan on May 6, 2013 18:59:44 GMT -5
So are you suggesting that he could be a confused Loyal or a stupid scum? If that's the case then I agree with it. Yeah. I don't think he's doing this as an act, I think he's just screwing up. Quite possibly I suggest we wait and not be so hasty to vote him off. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on May 6, 2013 18:59:53 GMT -5
OOC: Star, it was five pages in 2 hours, not 9 for the whole day.  IC: It looks like we're in a very interesting situation. Some people seem to be over-thinking what Sergemont's doing though. I don't think he's doing this as an act, I think he's either messing up as a loyal or screwing up even worse as scum. That's probably true. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on May 6, 2013 19:00:40 GMT -5
OOC: Star, it was five pages in 2 hours, not 9 for the whole day. IC: It looks like we're in a very interesting situation. Some people seem to be over-thinking what Sergemont's doing though. I don't think he's doing this as an act, I think he's either messing up as a loyal or screwing up even worse as scum. That's probably true. Well, only you would no if it really is true or not. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2013 19:01:18 GMT -5
Well, first of all, what makes you so suspicious of me? (no a retractile question) I realize I went was over the top, but I was just trying to roleplay. Second of all, people were over reacting when I said I was "testing" them, but uh........ that's what everyone does each game to try to figure out who's scum. I realize I didn't use the right word....... but the reaction of many people was over the top. - You said you were testing us.
- Whenever someone asks you a question you give a yes/no answer (like when someone suggesting you're scum, you said "perhaps...perhaps not...").
- You're extremely violent (this was proven when you threatened to shoot one of the players).
Seems convincing enough to me, to say the least. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on May 6, 2013 19:06:20 GMT -5
Well..... I screwed myself. All I can say is I can't blame you for voting me off. When it happens, and we all know it will just think about this: The people who were leading the offensive against me are either very confused loyals, or scum. When I come up loyal, just think about that. Since you don't know I'm loyal, I completely understand why you are all so suspicious of me. I when over the top on the role playing, and I know it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2013 19:07:30 GMT -5
- You said you were testing us.
- Whenever someone asks you a question you give a yes/no answer (like when someone suggesting you're scum, you said "perhaps...perhaps not...").
- You're extremely violent (this was proven when you threatened to shoot one of the players).
Seems convincing enough to me, to say the least. I must admit, though, I'm more inclined to believe he's just a confused loyal, and his testing was just a response to the situation. He felt uncomfortable around many whom he couldn't trust, so he began to poke and probe people with his behavior, and watching our reactions for scumminess. |
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on May 6, 2013 19:10:24 GMT -5
Well..... I screwed myself. All I can say is I can't blame you for voting me off. When it happens, and we all know it will just think about this: The people who were leading the offensive against me are either very confused loyals, or scum. When I come up loyal, just think about that. Since you don't know I'm loyal, I completely understand why you are all so suspicious of me. I when over the top on the role playing, and I know it. If you do get voted off and come up loyal, you can bet that I *will* go after the people who lead the vote. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 6, 2013 19:11:05 GMT -5
But why would he *act* so weird? I still can not get over why he would dare say such risky things.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on May 6, 2013 19:11:08 GMT -5
Well..... I screwed myself. All I can say is I can't blame you for voting me off. When it happens, and we all know it will just think about this: The people who were leading the offensive against me are either very confused loyals, or scum. When I come up loyal, just think about that. Since you don't know I'm loyal, I completely understand why you are all so suspicious of me. I when over the top on the role playing, and I know it. I don't think anyone could be a fault for accusing your considering how scummy you came off but I'm pretty sure your a confused loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on May 6, 2013 19:11:43 GMT -5
Seems convincing enough to me, to say the least. I must admit, though, I'm more inclined to believe he's just a confused loyal, and his testing was just a response to the situation. He felt uncomfortable around many whom he couldn't trust, so he began to poke and probe people with his behavior, and watching our reactions for scumminess. Why do it in such an odd manner? Although, there is a side of me that's growing that raises the possibility that he's a loyal that screwed up. We have plenty of time until voting, so I'll use that time to think over my decision. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on May 6, 2013 19:11:46 GMT -5
Well..... I screwed myself. All I can say is I can't blame you for voting me off. When it happens, and we all know it will just think about this: The people who were leading the offensive against me are either very confused loyals, or scum. When I come up loyal, just think about that. Since you don't know I'm loyal, I completely understand why you are all so suspicious of me. I when over the top on the role playing, and I know it. If you do get voted off and come up loyal, you can bet that I *will* go after the people who lead the vote. Annnnnd aren't you one of the people leading the offensive against him? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 6, 2013 19:13:04 GMT -5
Mmkay, um, why do you *all* think he's a confused loyal? I'm not disagreeing, but why is that a more plausible theory than him being scum?
|
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on May 6, 2013 19:14:49 GMT -5
If you do get voted off and come up loyal, you can bet that I *will* go after the people who lead the vote. Annnnnd aren't you one of the people leading the offensive against him? Nope. I'm the one giving evidence *for* him being scum. I do, however, have evidence that he may not be scum. For example... - Would a scum be so obvious?
- Maybe his "test" is to test our reactions to his behavior.
- Maybe's he's so violent because that's part of his plan to root out the scum (?).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2013 19:14:51 GMT -5
I must admit, though, I'm more inclined to believe he's just a confused loyal, and his testing was just a response to the situation. He felt uncomfortable around many whom he couldn't trust, so he began to poke and probe people with his behavior, and watching our reactions for scumminess. Why do it in such an odd manner? Although, there is a side of me that's growing that raises the possibility that he's a loyal that screwed up. We have plenty of time until voting, so I'll use that time to think over my decision. That's probably just the way he is.  |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on May 6, 2013 19:16:32 GMT -5
Mmkay, um, why do you *all* think he's a confused loyal? I'm not disagreeing, but why is that a more plausible theory than him being scum? Why would a scum act like that and what do scum get out of saying "I'm going to shoot you" it's obvious people would be suspicious after that and scum try and lay low most of the time. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2013 19:18:48 GMT -5
Mmkay, um, why do you *all* think he's a confused loyal? I'm not disagreeing, but why is that a more plausible theory than him being scum? It's just an opinion that a lot of us share. And no one said it's more plausible, I think a lot of people are basing that opinion off of a gut feeling rather than what he said (including me). His behavior did seem scummy, but it seems to me that, like I said, it was just a reaction to the sudden change of events. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 6, 2013 19:20:39 GMT -5
Mmkay, um, why do you *all* think he's a confused loyal? I'm not disagreeing, but why is that a more plausible theory than him being scum? Why would a scum act like that and what do scum get out of saying "I'm going to shoot you" it's obvious people would be suspicious after that and scum try and lay low most of the time. Not *all* the time. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 6, 2013 19:24:01 GMT -5
Mmkay, um, why do you *all* think he's a confused loyal? I'm not disagreeing, but why is that a more plausible theory than him being scum? It's just an opinion that a lot of us share. And no one said it's more plausible, I think a lot of people are basing that opinion off of a gut feeling rather than what he said (including me). His behavior did seem scummy, but it seems to me that, like I said, it was just a reaction to the sudden change of events. A sudden change of events that *he* started. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2013 19:25:43 GMT -5
It's just an opinion that a lot of us share. And no one said it's more plausible, I think a lot of people are basing that opinion off of a gut feeling rather than what he said (including me). His behavior did seem scummy, but it seems to me that, like I said, it was just a reaction to the sudden change of events. A sudden change of events that *he* started. The "change of events" I referred to was the discovery of the scum among us, not the commotion. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 6, 2013 19:28:29 GMT -5
A sudden change of events that *he* started. The "change of events" I referred to was the discovery of the scum among us, not the commotion. Ah, my mistake. Even so, it does not matter. To me, he seems more scummy than loyal, and I'm brave enough to risk it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2013 19:36:45 GMT -5
The "change of events" I referred to was the discovery of the scum among us, not the commotion. Ah, my mistake. Even so, it does not matter. To me, he seems more scummy than loyal, and I'm brave enough to risk it. Well, to each his own, then. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 6, 2013 19:38:13 GMT -5
Ah, my mistake. Even so, it does not matter. To me, he seems more scummy than loyal, and I'm brave enough to risk it. Well, to each his own, then. Agreed. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on May 6, 2013 19:39:00 GMT -5
The "change of events" I referred to was the discovery of the scum among us, not the commotion. Ah, my mistake. Even so, it does not matter. To me, he seems more scummy than loyal, and I'm brave enough to risk it. Yes, that was my logic. But if he is a scum, then why would he be so bold? Maybe he wants to janitor someone so they look suspicious and that person is against him? But what is making me not want to vote for him, is that what if his plan is to get voted off? What could the consequences be if any? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 6, 2013 19:40:25 GMT -5
Ah, my mistake. Even so, it does not matter. To me, he seems more scummy than loyal, and I'm brave enough to risk it. Yes, that was my logic. But if he is a scum, then why would he be so bold? Maybe he wants to janitor someone so they look suspicious and that person is against him? But what is making me not want to vote for him, is that what if his plan is to get voted off? What could the consequences be if any? A scum plan that gets rid of a member on Day 1 is surely not a good tactic. It's a foolish plan. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 6, 2013 19:43:23 GMT -5
Yes, that was my logic. But if he is a scum, then why would he be so bold? Maybe he wants to janitor someone so they look suspicious and that person is against him? But what is making me not want to vote for him, is that what if his plan is to get voted off? What could the consequences be if any? A scum plan that gets rid of a member on Day 1 is surely not a good tactic. It's a foolish plan. I think he has a plan to act this way, which means he's scum. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 6, 2013 19:47:09 GMT -5
A scum plan that gets rid of a member on Day 1 is surely not a good tactic. It's a foolish plan. I think he has a plan to act this way, which means he's scum. I don't disagree with you. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on May 6, 2013 19:47:28 GMT -5
Yes, that was my logic. But if he is a scum, then why would he be so bold? Maybe he wants to janitor someone so they look suspicious and that person is against him? But what is making me not want to vote for him, is that what if his plan is to get voted off? What could the consequences be if any? A scum plan that gets rid of a member on Day 1 is surely not a good tactic. It's a foolish plan. Good point. Maybe I will vote for him. But it is still early to be certain. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on May 6, 2013 19:48:51 GMT -5
I think he has a plan to act this way, which means he's scum. I don't disagree with you. Yes it very much makes sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on May 6, 2013 19:59:02 GMT -5
Meldor, why do you so strongly believe that this is a scum strategy? What makes you think it would be so foolish?
|
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on May 6, 2013 20:03:37 GMT -5
Meldor, why do you so strongly believe that this is a scum strategy? What makes you think it would be so foolish? You're changing your opinion awfully fast. |
|
Wars Story
IC: It looks like we're in a very interesting situation. Some people seem to be over-thinking what Sergemont's doing though. I don't think he's doing this as an act, I think he's either messing up as a loyal or screwing up even worse as scum.
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5