|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 23, 2013 11:29:12 GMT -5
Yes. Sevus seems likely. He's obvious, but it could be a scum tactic. I will probably vote him too. But he just better not say there's no evidence, because there is. Show me real evidence and I'll let you vote me off. Oh wait, you don't have real evidence. Then why am I "likely?" And you didn't accuse me before, but now that you're supposedly in the clear, you start pushing for me. |
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 23, 2013 11:30:30 GMT -5
I don't know. We might have to turn to chance or voting off IG or Servus.. I think my vote will go to Servus. Unlike IG, he hasn't gave any evidence to why he's a loyal. And unlike me, you haven't been paying attention. The evidence I gave? Third time I've said that. |
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 23, 2013 11:33:08 GMT -5
Hmm our next lead? Another Loyal dead? Oy how we are being deceived, we must find the Murderer ASAP. Vindi is Loyal, Dumkop has to be Loyal being the inspector, the murderer cant be Abob or why would he kill himslef? I Assure you i can be trusted, so the question is whos sitting here telling us lies? Either you're using flattery to try and convince the two most powerful loyals that you're loyal or you're actually loyal. I'm going with the second one for now. The first one is very possible, and, IMO, very likely. And our friend quickly changed the subject and didn't respond to it. |
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 23, 2013 11:33:54 GMT -5
I must apologise for voting for Haar everyone. I only thought that he maybe an inactive scum, since the scum team's lost two people. I don't blame you if you want to vote me off for voting for Haar. I should've thought it through more, I am sorry, but I warn you, that if you will vote for me, then you'll only add another loyal to the graveyard. Mistakes can happen. But we can't afford anymore. I see most people are suspicious of IG so we won't vote you off. Unless we find evidence that you might be scum. Actually they're suspicious of me, except I just pwned all their arguments. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Apr 23, 2013 11:37:18 GMT -5
Mistakes can happen. But we can't afford anymore. I see most people are suspicious of IG so we won't vote you off. Unless we find evidence that you might be scum. Actually they're suspicious of me, except I just pwned all their arguments. Why were they suspicious of you? I didn't get that conversation. |
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 23, 2013 11:40:17 GMT -5
My thoughts:
IG: Jumpy, used flimsy arguments to defend himself
Zaro (That is Squiggy, right?): He contributed that PM at the beginning and has been utterly useless, only hurling baseless accusations ever since. And nobody suspects him. Another suspicious thing. Could IG be trying to draw attention away from him?
Domkop: Only confirmed loyal.
(Mav): Seems loyal - was inspected and came up loyal.
Vindi: Same as (Mav)
Sobeck: A little too quick to dismiss the arguments against IG in favor of the things-that-you-guys-seem-to-think-are-arguments against me.
Amon: Not very active. A little jumpy, though.
(Ivar): Hasn't really done anything that makes me think he's scum or loyal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Apr 23, 2013 11:40:39 GMT -5
Actually they're suspicious of me, except I just pwned all their arguments. Why were they suspicious of you? I didn't get that conversation. I'm not too sure either, I haven't really spoken to Servus that much. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Apr 23, 2013 11:42:43 GMT -5
Mistakes can happen. But we can't afford anymore. I see most people are suspicious of IG so we won't vote you off. Unless we find evidence that you might be scum. Actually they're suspicious of me, except I just pwned all their arguments. Why were they suspicious of you? I didn't get that conversation. |
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 23, 2013 11:44:07 GMT -5
Actually they're suspicious of me, except I just pwned all their arguments. Why were they suspicious of you? I didn't get that conversation. Because I was against voting off Taun and Omega, who both turned out to be scum. But there really was little to no actual evidence against them. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Apr 23, 2013 11:51:12 GMT -5
Why were they suspicious of you? I didn't get that conversation. Because I was against voting off Taun and Omega, who both turned out to be scum. But there really was little to no actual evidence against them. I can see you've got a good argument there, we could inspect you instead maybe. |
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 23, 2013 11:53:38 GMT -5
Because I was against voting off Taun and Omega, who both turned out to be scum. But there really was little to no actual evidence against them. I can see you've got a good argument there, we could inspect you instead maybe. Maybe. But remember the scum leader. He could make me look like a scum. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2013 13:06:42 GMT -5
Yes, we know. You apparen'ly didn' see i', bu' yesterday, I inspected you, 'n you came up loyal. I think I remember seeing that. OOC: Sorry I can't fully remember  I usually have a better memory than this. OOC: |
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 23, 2013 13:45:32 GMT -5
My thoughts: IG: Jumpy, used flimsy arguments to defend himself Zaro (That is Squiggy, right?): He contributed that PM at the beginning and has been utterly useless, only hurling baseless accusations ever since. And nobody suspects him. Another suspicious thing. Could IG be trying to draw attention away from him? Domkop: Only confirmed loyal. (Mav): Seems loyal - was inspected and came up loyal. Vindi: Same as (Mav) Sobeck: A little too quick to dismiss the arguments against IG in favor of the things-that-you-guys-seem-to-think-are-arguments against me. Amon: Not very active. A little jumpy, though. (Ivar): Hasn't really done anything that makes me think he's scum or loyal. My top 3 suspicions are IG, Zaro, and Sobeck, in that order. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 23, 2013 14:00:10 GMT -5
Well, Servus' defense does seem solid... but so was IG's.. It's obvious that Servus just wanted more evidence although the evidence against Taun did seem strong enough.. Hmm... And then IG's defense... A scum *could* have made it up as well. I don't know who to vote for. There is evidence for and against both.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Apr 23, 2013 14:04:31 GMT -5
Well, Servus' defense does seem solid... but so was IG's.. It's obvious that Servus just wanted more evidence although the evidence against Taun did seem strong enough.. Hmm... And then IG's defense... A scum *could* have made it up as well. I don't know who to vote for. There is evidence for and against both. It's puzzling, but I'm starting to be sure one of them is scum. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 23, 2013 14:20:28 GMT -5
Well, Servus' defense does seem solid... but so was IG's.. It's obvious that Servus just wanted more evidence although the evidence against Taun did seem strong enough.. Hmm... And then IG's defense... A scum *could* have made it up as well. I don't know who to vote for. There is evidence for and against both. It's puzzling, but I'm starting to be sure one of them is scum. We could always vote off one and if he's loyal, we'll vote off the next.. But if we choose the loyal, the scum of the two could be the murderer. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Apr 23, 2013 14:22:42 GMT -5
It's puzzling, but I'm starting to be sure one of them is scum. We could always vote off one and if he's loyal, we'll vote off the next.. But if we choose the loyal, the scum of the two could be the murderer. It's risky, but it maybe the only chance we've got. However voting's not open yet, so I'm not set on anyone just yet. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Apr 23, 2013 14:28:46 GMT -5
Well, Servus' defense does seem solid... but so was IG's.. It's obvious that Servus just wanted more evidence although the evidence against Taun did seem strong enough.. Hmm... And then IG's defense... A scum *could* have made it up as well. I don't know who to vote for. There is evidence for and against both. It's puzzling, but I'm starting to be sure one of them is scum. Yes but who? We need to be sure. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Apr 23, 2013 14:29:54 GMT -5
It's puzzling, but I'm starting to be sure one of them is scum. Yes but who? We need to be sure. That's what I'm trying to figure out, but it's real tricky. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Apr 23, 2013 14:40:54 GMT -5
Yes but who? We need to be sure. That's what I'm trying to figure out, but it's real tricky. Maybe we should take a leap of faith? |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Apr 23, 2013 14:42:00 GMT -5
That's what I'm trying to figure out, but it's real tricky. Maybe we should take a leap of faith? It maybe the only chance we can take I guess. |
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 23, 2013 14:44:44 GMT -5
That's what I'm trying to figure out, but it's real tricky. Maybe we should take a leap of faith? *chuckles* I see what you did there.  |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 23, 2013 14:46:56 GMT -5
Leap of faith? What do you mean by doing that?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2013 14:48:01 GMT -5
Yes, I do call myself powerful. Thank you good sir. I'm sorry but Nam is a very experienced player....... just deal with  *Facepalm* you really dont understand the difference of IC and OOC do you? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Apr 23, 2013 14:55:53 GMT -5
I'm sorry but Nam is a very experienced player....... just deal with *Facepalm* you really dont understand the difference of IC and OOC do you? OOC: Bane didnt do anything wrong |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Apr 23, 2013 14:57:19 GMT -5
Maybe we should take a leap of faith? It maybe the only chance we can take I guess. It's risky but these are difficult times. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2013 15:01:21 GMT -5
*Facepalm* you really dont understand the difference of IC and OOC do you? OOC: Bane didnt do anything wrong Nam is a good player, but that has nothing to do with what we were talking about in IC. That was an OOC comment which i get confused on cause he tends to mix them in, is all without saying which is which sometimes. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2013 15:02:03 GMT -5
*Facepalm* you really dont understand the difference of IC and OOC do you? OOC: Bane didnt do anything wrong Nam is a good player, but that has nothing to do with what we were talking about in IC. That was an OOC comment which i get confused on cause he tends to mix them in, is all without saying which is which sometimes. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Apr 23, 2013 15:03:01 GMT -5
OOC: Bane didnt do anything wrong Nam is a good player, but that has nothing to do with what we were talking about in IC. That was an OOC comment which i get confused on cause he tends to mix them in, is all without saying which is which sometimes. Yeah.......alright lets leave it at that........ |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Apr 23, 2013 15:54:28 GMT -5
You can start sending in your votes here but I will not start the next topic yet because I want to do that tomorrow morning with pictures...
|
|
I usually have a better memory than this.
