|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 17, 2013 19:02:57 GMT -5
It's more of a loss that our protector didnt do his job  Yes. Hopefully whoever it is will step it up in the future.  I have to say I'm rather dissapointed that the protector didn't do their job. And because of it, a loyal died.  |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Apr 17, 2013 19:43:09 GMT -5
Yes. Hopefully whoever it is will step it up in the future. I have to say I'm rather dissapointed that the protector didn't do their job. And because of it, a loyal died. Yes, it was disappointing. OOC: Was Nornes confirmed as a loyal for the protector to protect him? |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Apr 17, 2013 19:45:08 GMT -5
So we lost Nornes, a loyal. At least we voted of Tauntaun, a member of the scum team.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 17, 2013 19:55:18 GMT -5
Omega is blaming Servus.. That means *one* of them isn't scum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Star on Apr 17, 2013 19:58:10 GMT -5
Omega is blaming Servus.. That means *one* of them isn't scum. Servus: Didn't want to believe that Tauntaun was scum. Omega: Sided with Tauntaun a lot before Zaro came with the PM info. I'm not sure which I think is more scum like. Probably Omega. A scum wouldn't stay to their belief like Sarvus did. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 17, 2013 19:59:16 GMT -5
Omega is blaming Servus.. That means *one* of them isn't scum. Servus: Didn't want to believe that Tauntaun was scum. Omega: Sided with Tauntaun a lot before Zaro came with the PM info. I'm not sure which I think is more scum like. Probably Omega. A scum wouldn't stay to their belief like Sarvus did. And Servus was confident enough to defend Taun even after the PM info. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2013 20:11:51 GMT -5
Alright currently my list of people Domkop: For the most part I believe he's telling the truth about his role and I trust him Vindi: I been talking to him for awhile and I also trust him Sarvus: Seems the most scummy at the moment and is my top suspicion Zaro: Seems Loyal since a scum was trying to manipulate him but he gives weird ideas that are not very helpful Omega: Don't fully trust him at the moment and he also seemed kinda close to Taun Taun at certain times Hasko: Not sure haven't talked to him much IG-90: Not sure Tetf: Also not sure but he's been pretty quiet and I don't trust him one bit Everyone else I either don't know who people are playing as or I badly talked to them. I helped more than you think. I gave the whole PM thing away , without that valid info you guys wouldn't have ever suspected TAUN TAUN in the first place. Which would have lead him to be manipulating us right now. Anyways i definatley fell better with the decsion of Sarvus then i do Omega. |
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 17, 2013 20:19:48 GMT -5
Omega is blaming Servus.. That means *one* of them isn't scum. Servus: Didn't want to believe that Tauntaun was scum. Omega: Sided with Tauntaun a lot before Zaro came with the PM info. I'm not sure which I think is more scum like. Probably Omega. A scum wouldn't stay to their belief like Sarvus did. I didn't even side with Taun Taun a lot. Show me the evidence that I did. |
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 17, 2013 20:24:01 GMT -5
Servus: Didn't want to believe that Tauntaun was scum. Omega: Sided with Tauntaun a lot before Zaro came with the PM info. I'm not sure which I think is more scum like. Probably Omega. A scum wouldn't stay to their belief like Sarvus did. I didn't even side with Taun Taun a lot. Show me the evidence that I did. I see where you got confused. Me and Tuan Taun just followed up on what we had to say. Just because someone agrees with someone, doesn't mean they're scum. Besides, IMO Servus sided with Taun Taun a lot more than I did (the only reason I'm saying this is because you seem to think that if someone agrees with someone else that makes them scum). |
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 17, 2013 20:24:43 GMT -5
Omega is blaming Servus.. That means *one* of them isn't scum. I'm not blaming anyone. I'm simply defending myself. |
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 17, 2013 20:33:55 GMT -5
Look. Some of you think I'm scum because I allegedly "sided with Taun Taun a lot". Define "sided" because I don't recall "siding" with him. We were both determined to find the scum (among others). But, come on. Some of you are judging me based on what Taun Taun did. How can you judge me based on someone else's actions? You look at what Taun Taun did then think I'm scum because of what he did. There's no logic in that. Now, when I suggested that we question the people who nominated Taun Taun, I was going to use their own actions to judge them...not Taun Taun's. I do admit, questions do have to arise if you were "close" to a revealed scum member, but at least don't judge me from what he did. His motives were dark. Mine, however, are light. I just want you all to think about what you're doing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Apr 17, 2013 20:35:35 GMT -5
Alright currently my list of people Domkop: For the most part I believe he's telling the truth about his role and I trust him Vindi: I been talking to him for awhile and I also trust him Sarvus: Seems the most scummy at the moment and is my top suspicion Zaro: Seems Loyal since a scum was trying to manipulate him but he gives weird ideas that are not very helpful Omega: Don't fully trust him at the moment and he also seemed kinda close to Taun Taun at certain times Hasko: Not sure haven't talked to him much IG-90: Not sure Tetf: Also not sure but he's been pretty quiet and I don't trust him one bit Everyone else I either don't know who people are playing as or I badly talked to them. I helped more than you think. I gave the whole PM thing away , without that valid info you guys wouldn't have ever suspected TAUN TAUN in the first place. Which would have lead him to be manipulating us right now. Anyways i definatley fell better with the decsion of Sarvus then i do Omega. Correction manipulate you not the rest of us. |
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 17, 2013 20:35:48 GMT -5
Look. Some of you think I'm scum because I allegedly "sided with Taun Taun a lot". Define "sided" because I don't recall "siding" with him. We were both determined to find the scum (among others). But, come on. Some of you are judging me based on what Taun Taun did. How can you judge me based on someone else's actions? You look at what Taun Taun did then think I'm scum because of what he did. There's no logic in that. Now, when I suggested that we question the people who nominated Taun Taun, I was going to use their own actions to judge them...not Taun Taun's. I do admit, questions do have to arise if you were "close" to a revealed scum member, but at least don't judge me from what he did. His motives were dark. Mine, however, are light. I just want you all to think about what you're doing. And you say Servous stood by his opioin when he thought Taun Taun was loyal. Hey, I thought he was loyal too, until the new evidence against him was presented. *That's*, when I switched sides. Like others did. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 17, 2013 21:23:54 GMT -5
Omega is blaming Servus.. That means *one* of them isn't scum. I'm not blaming anyone. I'm simply defending myself. By accusing others. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Apr 18, 2013 5:46:07 GMT -5
Servus: Didn't want to believe that Tauntaun was scum. Omega: Sided with Tauntaun a lot before Zaro came with the PM info. I'm not sure which I think is more scum like. Probably Omega. A scum wouldn't stay to their belief like Sarvus did. And Servus was confident enough to defend Taun even after the PM info. Well that makes it look very bad for Servus. Maybe he is scum. But that's very stupid for a scum to do. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Apr 18, 2013 6:21:06 GMT -5
Servus: Didn't want to believe that Tauntaun was scum. Omega: Sided with Tauntaun a lot before Zaro came with the PM info. I'm not sure which I think is more scum like. Probably Omega. A scum wouldn't stay to their belief like Sarvus did. I didn't even side with Taun Taun a lot. Show me the evidence that I did. Okay: 1. Apr 14, 2013 at 6:29pm Starwarrior247 said: Apr 14, 2013 at 6:27pm Potato said: Also, IG, why didn't you post your opinions on anything when I asked? You just ignored my question. To quote Vindi "Hmm...". Wait, when? I don't recall you asking me anything. You also ignored *my* question, IG. Read more: theambushgames.boards.net/thread/183/haters-jedi-day-morning-intro?page=7#ixzz2QoQpaHto2.Droid! How about you stop imitating the Doctor and help us find these scum. Unless you're just distracting/stalling us. If you disagree with this statement Droid, who do you think we should suspect? Who is the most suspicious to you? No one seems suspicious to me yet. (Tauntaun had said it at least two times already, and you just elaborated on it more, by posting this) Read more: theambushgames.boards.net/thread/183/haters-jedi-day-morning-intro?page=7#ixzz2QoQwodRb 3.Apr 14, 2013 at 6:32pm Potato said: Apr 14, 2013 at 6:31pm E-123 Omega (SWU) said: I'm getting tired of this. IG, if the Doctor is distracting you just ignore him until you get any suspicions towards him. Vindi, stop laughing all the time. Not everything is funny. You could also stop distracting IG. And Bo, stop agreeing with everyone and give your own, honest opinion. These games and delays aren't going to get the scum gone. (Tauntaun)This is what I've been trying to say. We're not off to a good start here. (Look. Tauntaun was trying t say the whole thing before, and you say this, agreeing with him) No we're not. I'm starting to get the feeling that these "distractions" are just staged. Perhaps by the scum. Read more: theambushgames.boards.net/thread/183/haters-jedi-day-morning-intro?page=7#ixzz2QoRP7b3tI'm not saying that these weren't good accusations/reasons by you, but you consistently agreed with Tauntaun the most out of everyone. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Apr 18, 2013 6:22:10 GMT -5
I'm resorting to finding evidence against Omega, because Servus seemed extremely foolish for a scum, making me trust him more than Omega. Unless someone can find more evidence against him, Omega will most likely be my vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 18, 2013 7:37:17 GMT -5
WARNING: SARCASM: Oh, yeah. I'm scum and I decided to blatantly defend my ally who was going to be voted off anyway.  SARCASM ENDS HERE Really guys? I thoght he was loyal. It's good that we voted off a scum, but your evidence was rather stupid. And I still don't like how defensive Nornes was. Even if he was loyal, he got himself killed because of it. I'm still not entirely sure of Zaro, but Nornes' loyalty makes me think he's loyal. My top suspect right now is IG. Except for accusing me, he's mostly been sitting around mocking people. When I started to seem scummy, he immediately jumped on the bandwagon. Also, since Taun is gone, SELECT: DOMKOP (Nat) |
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 18, 2013 7:38:13 GMT -5
WARNING: SARCASM: Oh, yeah. I'm scum and I decided to blatantly defend my ally who was going to be voted off anyway. SARCASM ENDS HERE Really guys? I thoght he was loyal. It's good that we voted off a scum, but your evidence was rather stupid. And I still don't like how defensive Nornes was. Even if he was loyal, he got himself killed because of it. I'm still not entirely sure of Zaro, but Nornes' loyalty makes me think he's loyal. My top suspect right now is IG. Except for accusing me, he's mostly been sitting around mocking people. When I started to seem scummy, he immediately jumped on the bandwagon. Also, since Taun is gone, SELECT: DOMKOP (Nat) *Facepalm* IG was accusing Omega, not me. |
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 18, 2013 7:39:32 GMT -5
As for Omega, would the scum really be stupid enough to try the same tactic on... was it two or three different people?
|
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 18, 2013 8:27:25 GMT -5
And another thing:  |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Apr 18, 2013 9:08:05 GMT -5
IG did seem a bit too much of a follower to me, but nevertheless Servus, I still find you suspicious. Even if you're telling the truth, it's going to be hard to take your word for it, no matter how convincing your evidence is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 18, 2013 13:55:50 GMT -5
I'm guessing one of the two (Servus and Omega) is scum. They wouldn't blame each other like that otherwise. (or in this case, just Omega accusing Servus) I'm leaning more on Omega considering a scum would accuse another.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Apr 18, 2013 14:09:39 GMT -5
Wow, a few deaths. And there looks like there will be more. But there are a few people I don't trust.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Apr 18, 2013 14:15:03 GMT -5
The voting/midday video will be up soon. And it will feature everyone's favorite drunken pirate!
|
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 18, 2013 14:19:21 GMT -5
The voting/midday video will be up soon. And it will feature everyone's favorite drunken pirate! *Gasp* Jack Sparrow!  |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Apr 18, 2013 14:19:53 GMT -5
Wow, a few deaths. And there looks like there will be more. But there are a few people I don't trust. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Apr 18, 2013 14:20:28 GMT -5
Wow, a few deaths. And there looks like there will be more. But there are a few people I don't trust. Will be back on later, GTG now though. |
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Apr 18, 2013 14:21:20 GMT -5
And another thing: Ugh. Stupid funnyjunk. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2013 14:22:12 GMT -5
The voting/midday video will be up soon. And it will feature everyone's favorite drunken pirate! *Gasp* Jack Sparrow! OOC: OMG! XD Hondo...! |
|
SARCASM ENDS HERE
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5