|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 2, 2013 18:48:56 GMT -5
The main thing that's wanting me to vote for Carnage is that Shockberry was defending him and there really is no one backing up Namailus alot if Nam is scum then his ally's are probably staying back. Where as Carnage has someone defending him which could be a possible scum ally. Savorus (or however you spell that) was backing up Namialus. They were the main two who were accusing me in the beginning. I had people defending me because, one, they don't want a loyal voted off and two, because they know you all are not making sense and are just blindly following someone with weak evidence that could be used against *anybody*. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2013 18:49:14 GMT -5
Would the scum make it that obvious? No, and that should be an indicator that neither me nor Carnage is scum. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2013 18:49:57 GMT -5
OOC: Bane so whats your deal are you in or out? What do you mean? I'm playing if that's what your asking.  OOC: Who're you RPing as? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2013 18:50:02 GMT -5
OOC: Bane so whats your deal are you in or out? What do you mean? I'm playing if that's what your asking. Indeed  |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Apr 2, 2013 18:51:14 GMT -5
The main thing that's wanting me to vote for Carnage is that Shockberry was defending him and there really is no one backing up Namailus alot if Nam is scum then his ally's are probably staying back. Where as Carnage has someone defending him which could be a possible scum ally. Savorus (or however you spell that) was backing up Namialus. They were the main two who were accusing me in the beginning. I had people defending me because, one, they don't want a loyal voted off and two, because they know you all are not making sense and are just blindly following someone with weak evidence that could be used against *anybody*. I wouldn't say weak it's more hit or miss evidence. I don't really know what to think of sarvous but he does seem to be trying to find scum. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2013 18:52:44 GMT -5
Would the scum make it that obvious? No, and that should be an indicator that neither me nor Carnage is scum. (OOC: forget who Newan is playing as so fill in his real name for his character )IC: Newan does have some points here you were defending Carnage no doubt? but could that be a diversion statement to get my eye off of Nam is what im trying to overcome...Theres alot to play out here. |
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 2, 2013 18:54:02 GMT -5
No, and that should be an indicator that neither me nor Carnage is scum. (OOC: forget who Newan is playing as so fill in his real name for his character )IC: Newan does have some points here you were defending Carnage no doubt? but could that be a diversion statement to get my eye off of Nam is what im trying to overcome...Theres alot to play out here. There really isn't if you're smart enough to see I'm loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Apr 2, 2013 18:55:42 GMT -5
No, and that should be an indicator that neither me nor Carnage is scum. (OOC: forget who Newan is playing as so fill in his real name for his character )IC: Newan does have some points here you were defending Carnage no doubt? but could that be a diversion statement to get my eye off of Nam is what im trying to overcome...Theres alot to play out here. The point about Shcokberry being Carnages ally was Nams idea but it is a good thought to consider. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2013 18:56:54 GMT -5
(OOC: forget who Newan is playing as so fill in his real name for his character )IC: Newan does have some points here you were defending Carnage no doubt? but could that be a diversion statement to get my eye off of Nam is what im trying to overcome...Theres alot to play out here. There really isn't if you're smart enough to see I'm loyal. All im doing is playing out all the cards here, i dont suspect you as much as nam or shockberry for when she sided with you, which doesnt make sense if you are loyal then she wouldnt defend you, but she did? so could you be leing, or is Nam the better choice.....and for what reasons? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2013 18:59:06 GMT -5
(OOC: forget who Newan is playing as so fill in his real name for his character )IC: Newan does have some points here you were defending Carnage no doubt? but could that be a diversion statement to get my eye off of Nam is what im trying to overcome...Theres alot to play out here. The point about Shcokberry being Carnages ally was Nams idea but it is a good thought to consider. If what you said is true i have no fear into suspecting Nam, i strongly think that was an open window to divert our attentions towards Carnage making him to use the whole shockberry conspiracy to make me think otherwise of Carnage... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2013 18:59:33 GMT -5
(OOC: forget who Newan is playing as so fill in his real name for his character )IC: Newan does have some points here you were defending Carnage no doubt? but could that be a diversion statement to get my eye off of Nam is what im trying to overcome...Theres alot to play out here. The point about Shcokberry being Carnages ally was Nams idea but it is a good thought to consider. Diversion? Tch. You can't defend against agressiveness of this magnitude. I am no scum, but I am a loyalist, freely expressing his opinion, and defending someone who I believe to be a fellow loyalist. Vote either of us off. You will immediately see we are both loyals. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2013 19:00:56 GMT -5
OOC: Homewrok time gtg, might be back tonihgt IC: O boy theres alot of stuff to think about here make sure you finalze your decsions before making one, theres so much and so many sides to chooose on who to convict, but im still convinced of Nam..
|
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 2, 2013 19:01:57 GMT -5
There really isn't if you're smart enough to see I'm loyal. All im doing is playing out all the cards here, i dont suspect you as much as nam or shockberry for when she sided with you, which doesnt make sense if you are loyal then she wouldnt defend you, but she did? so could you be leing, or is Nam the better choice.....and for what reasons? I think Namialus would be the better choice because, one, he accused me right off the bat and didn't even reconsider his choice. Then, he votes for me as soon as he could. That's why he kept asking Sith if we could vote now. Also, Savorus may be one of Namialus' allies because they both tag-teamed accused me from the beginning. Then, Newan joined in. Now, here are some reasons why Shockberry, CS (Bane), and (Malgus) are not scum. The main reason here is because they all defended me because they knew the others weren't making sense. Would the scum really be that ignorant as to give away who their allies are by defeating someone that much in the open like that? And, I already listed the reasons why I'm loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Apr 2, 2013 19:02:03 GMT -5
I probably won't vote today I don't want to make our day 1 decision in haste day 1 is always the hardest.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Apr 2, 2013 19:03:36 GMT -5
My guess is Nam......... why do you think that shockberry was so quick to defend him........ if they were loyal they would wait before accusing people with so little evidence. Oh course they might be double bluffing but I doubt it.........
|
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 2, 2013 19:04:10 GMT -5
All im doing is playing out all the cards here, i dont suspect you as much as nam or shockberry for when she sided with you, which doesnt make sense if you are loyal then she wouldnt defend you, but she did? so could you be leing, or is Nam the better choice.....and for what reasons? I think Namialus would be the better choice because, one, he accused me right off the bat and didn't even reconsider his choice. Then, he votes for me as soon as he could. That's why he kept asking Sith if we could vote now. Also, Savorus may be one of Namialus' allies because they both tag-teamed accused me from the beginning. Then, Newan joined in. Now, here are some reasons why Shockberry, CS (Bane), and (Malgus) are not scum. The main reason here is because they all defended me because they knew the other weren't making sense. Would the scum really be that ignorant as to give away who their allies are by defeating someone that much in the open like that? And, I already listed the reasons why I'm loyal. I forgot to mention that the reasons Namialus voted so quickly is because he knew I was loyal and wanted me gone. What faction knows who's loyal and who's not? Well, how about the scum? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2013 19:04:47 GMT -5
The point about Shcokberry being Carnages ally was Nams idea but it is a good thought to consider. Diversion? Tch. You can't defend against agressiveness of this magnitude. I am no scum, but I am a loyalist, freely expressing his opinion, and defending someone who I believe to be a fellow loyalist. Vote either of us off. You will immediately see we are both loyals. You have me all wrong i was trying to say Shock that was there a diversion by Nam to put our eye on you guys with the whole evidence of you guys teaming up, you and carnage?,so that he doesnt seem to Scummy? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 2, 2013 19:05:22 GMT -5
Also After reviewing the roles there's a good chance that Whoever is voted could be janitored and it says one janitor a night so what do we do if Toxin is janitored? Name's Carnage. And I will not be janitored! You have to be murdered in order for that to happen. OOC: You have to be voted off to be janitored. A murder victim is of course, loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 2, 2013 19:07:07 GMT -5
Name's Carnage. And I will not be janitored! You have to be murdered in order for that to happen. OOC: You have to be voted off to be janitored. A murder victim is of course, loyal. OOC: I see. I thought it was the other way around. My mistake. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Apr 2, 2013 19:07:12 GMT -5
One cannot simply accuse one of being scum for sounding scummy... Yes you can. Walk like a Scum, Talks like a Scum, probably is a scum. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 2, 2013 19:07:26 GMT -5
Here, think about this. Namialus just right off the bat accused me and didn't even considering changing his mind even once. Why you may ask? Because the scum know who's loyal and who are their teammates. There's nothing really to go on for anybody at this point, thus his weak reasons. -I accused you after seeing your conversation. -Namialus does not change his mind if no evidence comes up to disprove him. -My reasons are stronger than anyone's. |
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 2, 2013 19:08:14 GMT -5
Here, think about this. Namialus just right off the bat accused me and didn't even considering changing his mind even once. Why you may ask? Because the scum know who's loyal and who are their teammates. There's nothing really to go on for anybody at this point, thus his weak reasons. -I accused you after seeing your conversation. -Namialus does not change his mind if no evidence comes up to disprove him. -My reasons are stronger than anyone's. Your "reasons" can be used on anyone. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 2, 2013 19:08:32 GMT -5
Would the scum make it that obvious? No, and that should be an indicator that neither me nor Carnage is scum. No, and they think they're not making it obvious. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 2, 2013 19:09:03 GMT -5
-I accused you after seeing your conversation. -Namialus does not change his mind if no evidence comes up to disprove him. -My reasons are stronger than anyone's. Your "reasons" can be used on anyone. So why don't you use them? |
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Apr 2, 2013 19:10:34 GMT -5
Your "reasons" can be used on anyone. So why don't you use them? Because I am not as closed-minded as you and prefer to look for *actual* evidence. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2013 19:10:57 GMT -5
Your "reasons" can be used on anyone. So why don't you use them? Im not in this but but i wouldnt use it becuase its not supportive, but accusations have to start somewhere but still...you jumped to fast to vote him off like you knew he was loyal by being scum?Something with you doesnt add up and i can figure out what.. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 2, 2013 19:11:09 GMT -5
Some of you may think I rushed in my vote. I most certainly did not. Agree with me or not, I stand by my decision.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 2, 2013 19:11:26 GMT -5
So why don't you use them? Because I am not as closed-minded as you and prefer to look for *actual* evidence. And there is none, other than mine. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2013 19:11:35 GMT -5
*cant*
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 2, 2013 19:11:55 GMT -5
So why don't you use them? Im not in this but but i wouldnt use it becuase its not supportive, but accusations have to start somewhere but still...you jumped to fast to vote him off like you knew he was loyal by being scum?Something with you doesnt add up and i can figure out what.. ....I don't understand. |
|
Wars Story
